(“In Case You Missed It Monday” is my chance to showcase something that I wrote and published in another venue, but is still relevant. This week’s post originally appeared on OrangeMatter)
In my first post in this series, I introduced an online discussion that sparked a few ideas for me about ways in which some IT professionals have developed poor responses to common situations. In that post, I looked at what may be lurking underneath the frustration of a vendor “trying to please everyone.” In the second post of the series, I dug into a relatively common anxiety—our response when we feel that the skills we’ve worked hard to develop may become obsolete because of technological shifts in the industry.
And here, in the last installment, I want to look at the unhealthy ways we can think about vendors and their goals.
To underscore a point I’ve made throughout the series: this is not about shaming any specific individual. The online conversation was simply a launching point for my own introspective investigation.
Anti-Pattern 3: Alarm That the Vendor is Trying to Sell Me Something
The skeptic expressed annoyance about Microsoft pushing Azure in every demo, and was asked, “Where do you run your stuff? Do you have load balancers, firewalls, IDS, a security team, logs, db backups, and seamless patches all running your core business from a server under your desk?” To which the skeptic replied, “I run it wherever I want to run it. But Microsoft only focuses on Azure, because that is where they want everyone to go.”
OK, let’s make sure we’re all clear about something: Microsoft wants to make money. Microsoft salespeople want to make their quotas. Microsoft stockholders want their investments to grow. Vendors, by and large, exist to sell you things. The good, ethical vendors understand that telling you their solution does something which it does not do is a bad long-term strategy. But they certainly aren’t going to refrain from showing you tools or services that do solve your problem, simply because you have too many of their products already.
What I believe the skeptic is expressing here is common to IT pros—a form of mental exhaustion from having to weed through competing claims, software specs, internal requirements, and more. “I just wish they would give me the straight story for once!” is a feeling we all have when we’re at the end of our rope. It’s honest and true. It’s also incredibly unrealistic. Vendor A isn’t going to give you the straight story about vendor B’s solution. If they are worth doing business with, they won’t lie or trash talk vendor B, either. In fact, a good way to tell if a vendor is worth your time is by noting how little they say about the competition—the less, the better.
Of course, that leaves the hard work of parsing, analyzing, and deciding to you. This is what an old boss of mine liked to call “the work of the work.”
The Mostly Un-Necessary Summary
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the big takeaway from this is that even experienced IT practitioners can fall into poor thinking patterns and reactive responses based on emotion rather than thoughtful analysis. We are best when we take a step back, think about why we may be having a strong reaction to a particular situation, and then decide whether that reaction is the best way to move toward an effective solution.
Another, more specific point is that even when someone else is having a difficult time overcoming their own biases and anxieties, we can learn from that moment and become better IT professionals because of it.
And of course, we should all be very thoughtful about what we post on social media, lest we become the object of a series of blog posts like this one.